OTLP-4278 Update Kubernetes example to latest version

[shree007]

Description:
The k8s example here has old otel collector image which does not had the new tls config implementation so replacing with new one and command line flag --mem-ballast-size-mib has been deprecated so removed that flag as well.

Link to tracking Issue:
4247

Testing:
I performed following steps in minikube k8s
$ kubectl apply -f otel-config.yaml

$ kubectl get pod

and checked all pod were up and there were no TLS error

Documentation:
Once it gets merged I will update the docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #4329 (0517737) into main (c0e8f31) will increase coverage by 1.49%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4329      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.07%   89.57%   +1.49%     
==========================================
  Files         173      176       +3     
  Lines       10188    10376     +188     
==========================================
+ Hits         8973     9294     +321     
+ Misses        975      844     -131     
+ Partials      240      238       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
service/zpages.go	79.38% <0.00%> (-0.82%)	⬇️
config/config.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
config/exporter.go	88.88% <0.00%> (ø)
config/receiver.go	88.88% <0.00%> (ø)
config/extension.go	88.88% <0.00%> (ø)
config/processor.go	88.88% <0.00%> (ø)
config/configgrpc/configgrpc.go	93.91% <0.00%> (ø)
model/pdata/generated_common.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
model/pdata/generated_resource.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
exporter/exporterhelper/factory.go	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 49 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c0e8f31...0517737. Read the comment docs.

[shree007]

/easycla

[codeboten]

Looks like the CLA check is failing, does this PR superseed #4278?

[shree007]

Looks like the CLA check is failing, does this PR superseed #4278?

@codeboten yes Easycla is not working, i filed one support ticket for that.
I have tested with 0.38.0 and it's working i fine.
I have replaced previous image tag with 0.38.0 as you commented and resolved the conversation.
Yes #4278 would be suppressed.

[codeboten]

/easycla

[nickmango]

/easycla

[jpkrohling]

@nickmango, do you have news about the EasyCLA check?

[nickmango]

/easycla

[WillsonHG]

this is a troubleshooting comment /easycla

[WillsonHG]

/easycla

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ Shree Prakash (073b137, 5ae5d8e)

[wanyaland]

@nickmango, do you have news about the EasyCLA check?

@jpkrohling yes this has been fixed

[jpkrohling]

/easycla

[jpkrohling]

@shree007, looks like there's a missing piece to your local git configuration :-) Look at the link provided in an earlier comment by the EasyCLA integration.

[shree007]

@shree007, looks like there's a missing piece to your local git configuration :-) Look at the link provided in an earlier comment by the EasyCLA integration.

@jpkrohling checking from my end.

[shree007]

@shree007, looks like there's a missing piece to your local git configuration :-) Look at the link provided in an earlier comment by the EasyCLA integration.

@jpkrohling checking from my end.

@jpkrohling Looks like Easycla has been resolved, I need your approval here, please have a look.

[bogdandrutu]

@shree007 yaay, thanks a tone for all the effort.

[shree007]

Thanks @jpkrohling @bogdandrutu @wanyaland for all the help.